Why the Bible Always Trumps Experience
Picture a scene that happens more often than most pastors realize. A man in his fifties survives a massive heart attack. His heart stopped for several minutes in the emergency room. The medical team brought him back. Two days later, sitting up in his hospital bed, he tells his family that during those minutes he met Jesus. And Jesus, he says, told him three things: there is no such thing as hell. Everyone ends up saved in the end. The idea of eternal separation from God is a misunderstanding the church has been teaching for two thousand years.
The family is confused. The man seems calm and sincere. His face is softer than it used to be. He says he is no longer afraid of death. He says he loves people more than he ever did before. Something happened to him on that operating table. No one in the room doubts that.
His wife, Linda, has been a believer all her life. She knows her Bible well enough to notice that some of what her husband is saying does not match what she has been taught for forty years. But she is also looking at the man she almost lost. She can hardly tell him his beautiful vision is wrong. Their grown daughter, who has drifted from the faith over the last decade, is tearing up. "See?" she says. "I've been telling you for years, Mom. All that hell stuff. It's just church fear. Dad went there and came back and he's telling us the truth." And Bill himself is lying in the bed, exhausted but radiant, certain he has seen something that has settled every question he ever had.
Two pastors come to visit him. They hear the same story. And they respond in very different ways.
The first pastor thinks for a moment and then says gently, "Well, Bill, you had a real experience. Who are we to tell you what Jesus said or didn't say? Maybe the church has been wrong. Maybe we need to listen to you. God moves in mysterious ways."
The second pastor listens just as carefully. He takes Bill's hand. But when Bill finishes, the second pastor says, "Bill, I believe something happened to you. I won't pretend I can explain every part of it. But I have to tell you something honestly, as your friend and your pastor. The being you met told you things that the Jesus of the Bible directly contradicts. The Jesus who walked the hills of Galilee and died on a Roman cross spoke about hell more than anyone else in the New Testament. He said things like, 'Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire' (Matthew 25:41). He warned people with tears in His voice. That is the real Jesus. So whatever you met, and whatever that encounter was, the message you received cannot have come from Him. I love you too much to pretend otherwise."
Which pastor is right?
The second pastor. And this chapter exists to explain, carefully and kindly, why.
Because the question is not an abstract one. It is a question that will shape what Bill tells his daughter about eternity. It is a question that will shape how Linda makes it through the next fifteen years of marriage. It is a question that will shape whose Jesus Bill's grandchildren hear about when they come to visit. The stakes of getting the answer right are not theoretical. They are pastoral all the way down.
Here is the principle in one sentence. When a near-death experience, a deathbed experience, a dream, a vision, an angelic visitation, or any other spiritual encounter teaches something that clearly contradicts the Scriptures, the Scriptures win. Always. Every time. No exceptions.
This is not an anti-experience position. It is not a cold, rationalist dismissal of supernatural encounters. It is not a way of closing our eyes to the possibility that God still meets dying people at the edge of eternity. In fact, this entire book argues that He does meet them, and that most NDEs and deathbed visions are genuine spiritual experiences worth taking seriously.1 What we are saying here is something different. We are saying that when experiences and Scripture conflict, Scripture is the rule. Experience is tested; Scripture does the testing.
That might sound obvious to some readers. For others, it cuts against everything their culture has taught them. We live in an age that treats personal experience as the final authority on almost everything. "This is my truth." "No one can tell me what I felt." "You weren't there." Those phrases are part of the air we breathe. Bringing Scripture in as a higher authority over experience feels, to modern ears, almost rude. It sounds like we are saying the experiencer is lying or confused or unimportant. But that is not what we are saying at all. We are saying something much older and much more hopeful. We are saying that God, in His kindness, has given us a standard that is fixed and public and knowable—so that no one has to be at the mercy of his own private vision, and no one has to trust a teacher just because the teacher claims to have been somewhere the rest of us haven't.
Any spiritual claim that contradicts the clear teaching of Scripture is, by that fact alone, false. It does not matter how beautiful, how loving, how transformative, or how credible the experiencer is. If the message cannot be reconciled with the Bible, the message fails the test. This is not an anti-experiential posture; it is the historic Christian posture, and it is the only posture that gives the Christian a stable place to stand.
Notice I said clear teaching of Scripture. We will have more to say later in this chapter about the difference between what Scripture plainly teaches and what various Christians have interpreted Scripture to mean. Not every Christian dispute counts as a "clear teaching" being contradicted. But there are plenty of things Scripture plainly teaches that are plainly contradicted by certain NDE claims—and those are the contradictions we are talking about.
The rest of this chapter walks through four things. First, we will look at what the Bible says about itself. Why does Scripture claim this kind of authority? Second, we will apply that principle to NDEs by listing some specific teachings that sometimes appear in NDE literature and contradict the Bible. Third, we will handle two big objections that people raise against the principle. And fourth, we will close with what this all means in practice, for the Christian who has a loved one with a wild NDE story, or who has a stack of NDE books on the nightstand, or who has had an experience of his own.
Every authority has to come from somewhere. The authority of a police officer comes from the government that sent him. The authority of a doctor comes from her training and her license. The authority of a judge comes from the court that seated him. So where does the authority of the Bible come from, and why do Christians keep insisting that it outranks personal spiritual experience?
The short answer is: because the Bible claims to come from God Himself. If that claim is true, then of course it outranks everything. No private vision, no personal encounter, no NDE, no angelic visitation, no dream, and no sermon can carry more weight than the words of the God who made heaven and earth. And the Bible's self-testimony to being God's own speech is not thin or occasional. It runs through the whole thing, Old Testament and New.
Let me walk you through five of the clearest places where Scripture speaks about its own authority. I'll try to keep the technical stuff light, but I want you to see the texts themselves, because this chapter's whole case stands or falls on whether these texts really do say what historic Christianity has always said they say.
The most famous passage on the nature of Scripture is 2 Timothy 3:16–17. Here it is in full:
"All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work." (2 Timothy 3:16–17, ESV)
The phrase "breathed out by God" translates a single Greek word: theopneustos (θεόπνευστος). It is a compound word. Theos means "God." Pneustos comes from pneō, the verb "to breathe." So the Scriptures are, literally, "God-breathed"—God's own exhaled speech, now written down.2
Think about what that image is doing. When you speak, your breath carries your words. Your words are not something separate from you—they are how you express yourself. So when Paul says the Scriptures are God-breathed, he is not saying they are a poem that God inspired the way a beautiful sunset might inspire a poet. He is saying they are God's own words, expressed through human writers, so that what Scripture says, God says.3
This is a stunning claim. And it applies, Paul says, to "all Scripture." Not selected parts. Not the bits we find convenient. Not the verses that confirm what we already felt. All of it. The hard parts about judgment. The strange parts we don't understand. The parts that rebuke us. All of it is the breath of God.
Now think about what this means for the NDE conversation. If the words of Scripture are the breath of God Himself, then a message delivered to someone during an NDE has to submit to those words. It does not matter how luminous the being was, how warm the love felt, or how "realer than real" the experience seemed.4 If the message contradicts what God has already said, then whatever was speaking during that NDE was not God. Because God does not contradict Himself.
Here is the passage that settled this question for me more than any other. It is 2 Peter 1:16–21. And what makes it so powerful is who is writing it.
"For we did not follow cleverly devised myths when we made known to you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but we were eyewitnesses of his majesty. For when he received honor and glory from God the Father, and the voice was borne to him by the Majestic Glory, 'This is my beloved Son, with whom I am well pleased,' we ourselves heard this very voice borne from heaven, for we were with him on the holy mountain. And we have the prophetic word more fully confirmed, to which you will do well to pay attention as to a lamp shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts, knowing this first of all, that no prophecy of Scripture comes from someone's own interpretation. For no prophecy was ever produced by the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit." (2 Peter 1:16–21, ESV)
Read that slowly. Peter is referring to his own experience at the Transfiguration (Matthew 17; Mark 9; Luke 9). He was there. He saw Jesus glow with uncreated light. He saw Moses and Elijah. He heard the Father's voice speak from the cloud. This was not a dream. This was not a vision. This was a live, shared, supernatural encounter involving three apostles and the Son of God Himself.
And what does Peter say about that experience? He says, "We have the prophetic word more fully confirmed." In other words: Scripture is more reliable than his own eyewitness experience of the Transfiguration. Peter says his readers should "do well to pay attention" to the written word "as to a lamp shining in a dark place."5 Peter did not tell his readers: "Come listen to me tell you about the time I heard God's voice on the mountain, and then you'll know the truth." He told them to go read their Bibles.
Imagine the implications for NDE testimonies. If Peter's experience of the Transfiguration—a real, bodily, verified encounter with the glorified Christ—did not override Scripture, but submitted to it, then no one else's spiritual experience overrides Scripture either. Not the NDEr who met a being of light. Not the mystic who had a vision in her prayer closet. Not even the apostle Peter himself on the Mount of Transfiguration. All of it bends the knee to the written Word.6
We live in an age where spiritual experience is often treated as self-authenticating—meaning, if it felt real, it must be trustworthy. But Peter, writing under the Spirit, refused to let his readers rest their faith on his own astonishing experience. He pointed them to the Scriptures. If the apostle who actually witnessed the Transfiguration would not place his experience above Scripture, neither should we place any NDE account above it, no matter how dramatic the testimony.
Here is something worth pausing over. If we want to know how to relate to Scripture, we should watch how Jesus Himself related to it. After all, the Christian faith stands or falls on Jesus. Whatever He modeled is what we should model.
And what did Jesus do with Scripture? He treated it as the unbreakable Word of God.
When He was tempted by Satan in the wilderness (Matthew 4; Luke 4), He responded each time with "It is written." He did not argue with Satan from His own authority as the divine Son. He did not reason from philosophy. He quoted Deuteronomy. Three times. When God incarnate Himself faced the tempter, He reached for Scripture as the weapon.7
When Jesus was challenged by the Sadducees about the resurrection, He grounded His answer in the tense of a verb in Exodus 3:6—"I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob." Jesus argued from the present tense of the verb "I am" that God is "not God of the dead, but of the living" (Matthew 22:32). That is the level of trust Jesus placed in the Scriptures: He built an argument on a verb tense.
When He was asked about marriage and divorce, He grounded His answer in Genesis 1 and 2—"Have you not read that he who created them from the beginning made them male and female" (Matthew 19:4). When He debated the Pharisees about the Sabbath, He reached for 1 Samuel 21 (Matthew 12:3–4). When He wanted to describe His own death, He referred to Jonah (Matthew 12:40). When He explained His mission after the resurrection, He "opened their minds to understand the Scriptures" and walked the Emmaus road disciples through "Moses and all the Prophets" (Luke 24:27, 45).
Perhaps most striking of all is John 10:35, where Jesus says, almost in passing, "Scripture cannot be broken." The Greek phrase is simple and breathtaking: οὐ δύναται λυθῆναι ἡ γραφή, literally "the Scripture is not able to be broken." Jesus makes that claim in the middle of an argument, as if it is so uncontroversial that no one would dispute it.8
Think what this means. If Jesus—God in human flesh—related to Scripture as the unbreakable Word of God and grounded His teaching in it at every turn, then any spiritual being who claims to be Jesus but teaches us to bypass, correct, or overturn Scripture cannot be the real Jesus. The Jesus of the Gospels would never do what the being in a bad NDE sometimes does. The real Jesus does not show up to tell you the Bible got hell wrong. The real Jesus does not show up to release you from the Bible's teaching on exclusivity, repentance, or judgment. He shows up, and if He speaks, He sounds like the Jesus the Gospels already gave us.
This is one of the most useful tests in our whole chapter. When you hear an NDE report that supposedly involves Jesus, ask: does the Jesus in this account sound like the Jesus of the four Gospels? Or does He sound like a generalized New Age guru wearing Jesus' clothes? The Jesus of the Gospels cared about the Scriptures. He was steeped in them. He taught from them. If the Jesus in an NDE account tells the experiencer to move past Scripture, to correct Scripture, or to dismiss what Scripture says about Himself, something is wrong.9
All through the Bible, God tells His people not to tamper with His Word. They are not to add anything to it. They are not to subtract anything from it. What God has said is sufficient, and what He has said is final. Four passages deserve our attention here.
Deuteronomy 4:2: "You shall not add to the word that I command you, nor take from it, that you may keep the commandments of the LORD your God that I command you." The same command is repeated in Deuteronomy 12:32.
Proverbs 30:5–6: "Every word of God proves true; he is a shield to those who take refuge in him. Do not add to his words, lest he rebuke you and you be found a liar."
And then, at the very end of the Bible, Revelation 22:18–19: "I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: if anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues described in this book, and if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God will take away his share in the tree of life and in the holy city, which are described in this book." Some Bible scholars debate whether Revelation 22:18–19 applies only to the book of Revelation or to the whole biblical canon. For our purposes, the principle holds either way: God's written word is not to be tampered with.10
Now, keep this principle in mind when you hear an NDEr say something like, "The being I met told me hell does not exist." That is a teaching that directly contradicts the teaching of Jesus, who spoke about hell more than any other person in the New Testament. If we accept the NDEr's statement as a new revelation, we are doing exactly what Scripture forbids. We are adding to God's word (new revelation from a being of light) and subtracting from God's word (canceling Jesus's teaching about judgment). Scripture itself warns us off that path. Anyone who comes along claiming a new revelation that overturns the old one is, by Scripture's own standard, not speaking for God.
This is the verse every Christian dealing with NDEs needs to memorize. Galatians 1:6–9:
"I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting him who called you in the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel—not that there is another one, but there are some who trouble you and want to distort the gospel of Christ. But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed. As we have said before, so now I say again: If anyone is preaching to you a gospel contrary to the one you received, let him be accursed." (Galatians 1:6–9, ESV)
The word Paul uses here is remarkable. The Greek is anathema (ἀνάθεμα), which means "accursed" or "devoted to destruction"—a person or thing placed under God's judgment and rejected from fellowship.11 Paul doesn't say, "If an angel tells you something strange, listen respectfully and pray about it." He says, "If an angel preaches a different gospel, that angel is accursed." The messenger's radiance does not make the message true. The only thing that makes a message true is whether it matches the gospel already delivered by the apostles.
Do you see why this is so important for NDE discernment? Galatians 1:8 is not an abstract hypothetical anymore. In the NDE literature, we regularly meet accounts where a being of light tells the experiencer a different gospel. A gospel of universalism. A gospel of reincarnation. A gospel of self-salvation. A gospel where all religions lead to the same source. A gospel where Jesus is just one teacher among many.12 Paul already gave us the rule for that exact scenario. "Let him be accursed." Reject the message. Reject the messenger. No matter how bright.
Michael Sabom, the Christian cardiologist who conducted the famous Atlanta Study, reached this same conclusion after more than two decades of studying near-death experiences up close. He wrote that when a being in an NDE teaches things that contradict the Bible, the being's "real identity can be determined only by comparing what it teaches to the Bible." Then he quoted Galatians 1:8 and called it the "only reliable yardstick." He concluded, "Without the Word of God, we are without a road map to determine good from evil, and Satan and his demons are free to deceive 'even the elect.'"13
I find Sabom's witness especially powerful here. He is not a skeptic. He is not an outsider to the NDE world. He is a board-certified cardiologist who has sat at the bedsides of hundreds of cardiac arrest survivors and taken their testimonies with tape recorders. He believes most NDEs are genuine spiritual experiences. And that man, with that depth of experience, lands on Galatians 1:8 as the test. Because he has seen enough to know that the NDE world contains real gold and real counterfeits, and he needs a standard that is not his own gut.
If an NDE report includes a being of light who teaches a gospel different from the gospel Paul and the other apostles preached—a gospel without the cross, without personal repentance, without Jesus as the unique Savior, without a real heaven and hell—the biblical verdict is clear. That being is accursed, and its message is to be rejected. The being's brightness is not evidence of its trustworthiness. Only the content of its message, tested against Scripture, tells us what it is.
One more passage, because it changes the whole feel of this discussion. Acts 17:11, describing a group of Jews in a Greek city called Berea who were listening to Paul preach:
"Now these Jews were more noble than those in Thessalonica; they received the word with all eagerness, examining the Scriptures daily to see if these things were so." (Acts 17:11, ESV)
Read that again slowly. The Bereans were listening to the Apostle Paul. The man who wrote roughly half of the New Testament. The man who was knocked off his horse by the risen Christ on the Damascus road. The man who was caught up to the third heaven and heard things that he was not permitted to say (2 Corinthians 12:1–4). This man is standing in their synagogue preaching, and they are opening their Old Testaments to see whether what he says lines up with Scripture.
And here is the astonishing thing: Luke, writing under inspiration, calls this practice "more noble." Not suspicious. Not arrogant. Not closed-minded. More noble. The willingness of the Bereans to test Paul's preaching against their Bibles was a virtue, not a vice.
If the Apostle Paul's preaching was tested against Scripture, there is no NDE account, no visionary experience, and no modern teaching that stands above Scripture. Everything submits to the test. Our job is to be Bereans.14
Now let's make this practical. We have laid out the biblical case that Scripture stands above every spiritual experience as the final standard. Let's apply that principle to some specific teachings that often appear in NDE accounts. I am not claiming that every NDE contains these teachings—in fact, one of the central arguments of this book is that most NDEs are free of clearly unbiblical content.15 But when these teachings do appear, the Christian reader needs to know what to do with them. Here is the pattern to follow in each case. Quote the teaching. Name the biblical text it contradicts. Reject the teaching, regardless of how beautiful or credible the experiencer is.
Some NDErs report recovering memories of previous lives during their experience. Some are told, by a being in the experience, that they have lived before and will live again. The claim is that human souls pass through many lifetimes, learning lessons, working off karma, growing toward enlightenment.
Scripture's answer is direct. Hebrews 9:27: "And just as it is appointed for man to die once, and after that comes judgment." The Greek word translated "once" is hapax (ἅπαξ), which means "once for all," "one time only."16 Each person dies once. After that death comes judgment, not another life. The biblical framework of human existence is linear, not cyclical. A single life, a single death, a single judgment, and a single eternal destiny.17
When an NDEr says a being of light taught them about their past lives, the teaching is false. That does not mean the experiencer was lying or that nothing happened to them. It means that whatever they encountered, the teaching it delivered cannot be from the God of the Bible. We will treat this topic more fully in Chapter 23.
This is perhaps the most common theological error in the NDE literature. The NDEr reports that they were shown, during their experience, that all religions lead to the same place. God loves everyone. No one goes to hell. Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, and every other faith are simply different doorways to the same divine light.
Scripture could not be clearer in the other direction. Jesus said, "I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me" (John 14:6). Peter said, "And there is salvation in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved" (Acts 4:12). The New Testament's whole witness is that Jesus is the unique Son of God, the only Savior, the only way to the Father.18
When an NDEr says their experience taught them that all religions are equally valid, that teaching is a "different gospel" of exactly the kind Paul anathematizes in Galatians 1:8. And it is telling that in the NDE literature, syncretistic teaching almost always appears in the interpretation layer of the experience, not in the core phenomenology. Shaun Tabatt documents how often the actual encounter is ambiguous enough to be reshaped afterward by the experiencer's prior worldview and subsequent reading.19 We will pick up this thread in Chapter 9 on the experience-interpretation distinction and Chapter 25 on universalist-syncretist themes in NDE literature.
Some NDEs—especially in the more popular secular literature—include a teaching that hell does not exist. The loving being of light tells the experiencer that the very idea of eternal judgment is a human invention, a mistake, a projection of religious fear.
Of all the teachings that appear in problematic NDEs, this one is perhaps the most jarring. Because the Jesus of the New Testament spoke about hell more than any other person. It was not a minor theme. He used the word Gehenna (γέεννα), "the place of fire," at least eleven times in the Gospels.20 He warned in Mark 9:43–48 of "the unquenchable fire," "where their worm does not die and the fire is not quenched." He told the parable in Matthew 25:31–46 of a final judgment where the King says to those on His left, "Depart from me, you cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels" (Matthew 25:41). And He warned His hearers in Matthew 10:28, "Do not fear those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul. Rather fear him who can destroy both soul and body in hell."
So when an NDEr reports that Jesus told them hell is not real, something is seriously wrong. The Jesus of the Gospels taught something different. And while Christians differ about the exact nature of hell—whether it involves eternal conscious torment, or annihilation of the unrepentant, or some form of purgation—every orthodox Christian view of the afterlife holds that final judgment is real and that there is an eternal destiny for those who reject God.21 An NDE that denies this cannot be delivering a message from the Christ of the Gospels.
Sometimes NDE accounts include a teaching that personal salvation through Jesus is unnecessary. The experiencer is told, "You are already loved. You don't need to be saved from anything. The very idea that God demands a sacrifice is outdated." This is, of course, very close to the universalism we already discussed, but it adds a specific denial of the cross.
The whole New Testament burns with the opposite message. "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life" (John 3:16). "There is salvation in no one else" (Acts 4:12). "For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast" (Ephesians 2:8–9). Salvation through the cross of Christ is not one doctrine among many—it is the central event in the history of the world, according to the New Testament.22
A being who tells an experiencer that Jesus's death on the cross was unnecessary is not the Jesus of Scripture. The Jesus of Scripture said, "The Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many" (Mark 10:45). He went to the cross deliberately, with full knowledge of what He was doing, because without His death there is no salvation.
Certain NDE accounts teach that there is no such thing as evil—only the illusion of duality, or our limited perspective that perceives things as bad when they are actually part of a cosmic harmony. Sin, on this view, is just a lack of awareness.
Scripture denies this at every turn. Genesis 3 tells the story of a real fall into real sin. Romans 3:10–18 describes the human condition after the fall in stark terms. Romans 3:23: "For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God." 1 John 1:8: "If we say we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us." Evil is real. Sin is real. We need a Savior because we actually have something to be saved from, not because we are confused.23
One of the most subtle and dangerous teachings in the NDE literature is the teaching that the experiencer is divine, or that all humans are part of God, or that we will one day become gods ourselves. The being of light whispers, "You are a spark of the divine. You are God."
This is not a new teaching. In fact, it is the oldest teaching in the book—literally. Genesis 3:5 records the serpent's original lie to Eve: "You will be like God." The whole biblical story begins with humans grasping at divinity that is not theirs and ends with humans being restored to their proper place as image-bearers, not gods.24
God Himself says, "I am God, and there is no other; I am God, and there is none like me" (Isaiah 46:9). And again, "I am the LORD, and there is no other, besides me there is no God" (Isaiah 45:5). The Creator-creature distinction is the most fundamental category in biblical theology. Human beings are made in God's image. We are not part of God. We are not little gods. We are creatures, glorious in our own way, crowned with glory and honor (Psalm 8:5), but always and forever distinct from the One who made us.25
When an NDEr reports being told they are divine, that teaching repeats the serpent's oldest lie. The glowing being who delivers it is not who it claims to be.
Finally, some NDE accounts—and more commonly, the books and ministries that grow out of them—encourage practices like contacting deceased loved ones through mediums, channeling, or psychic work.
Scripture is not ambiguous here. Isaiah 8:19–20: "And when they say to you, 'Inquire of the mediums and the necromancers who chirp and mutter,' should not a people inquire of their God? Should they inquire of the dead on behalf of the living? To the teaching and to the testimony! If they will not speak according to this word, it is because they have no dawn." Deuteronomy 18:10–12 includes necromancy in a list of practices that are "an abomination to the LORD."26
Tabatt argues, persuasively in my view, that what passes for communication with the dead in psychic and medium work is almost always demonic deception rather than genuine contact with departed souls.27 We will develop this in detail in Chapter 26. For now, the point is that any NDE-adjacent ministry that encourages believers to seek contact with the dead is practicing what Scripture forbids. That is a failure of the Scripture-above-experience test.
· · ·
Do you see the pattern? In each case, the rule is the same. Find the teaching. Find the Scripture it contradicts. Reject the teaching. This is not harsh. This is not closed-minded. This is simply Christianity as the apostles practiced it and passed it on.
In Light and Death, Michael Sabom recounts his careful study of a woman whose NDE included warm, loving, "Christ-like" figures who told her things deeply at odds with historic Christian teaching. Sabom did not reject her report as a fabrication. He took her seriously as a person and listened carefully to what she said. But when the content of the messages contradicted Scripture, he concluded that whatever she had encountered was not the biblical Christ, no matter how convincing the encounter felt at the time. This is the pattern: personal kindness toward the experiencer, paired with unflinching willingness to test the content against Scripture.
Let me slow down and work through one real-world example, because I think it will help us see the principle in action. In 2012, a Harvard-trained neurosurgeon named Dr. Eben Alexander published Proof of Heaven: A Neurosurgeon's Journey into the Afterlife. The book became a runaway New York Times bestseller. It was adapted for multiple media. Millions of readers encountered it. Many Christians picked it up hoping to find a doctor's careful, objective confirmation of the biblical heaven.
What they got was something different. Alexander's NDE, suffered during a weeklong coma caused by a severe case of bacterial meningitis, included encounters with a beautiful being and visits to luminous realms. Those parts, taken on their own, could be read as consistent with biblical heaven. But the theological conclusions Alexander drew from his experience—and the teaching he has developed out of it in subsequent books and speaking tours—diverge sharply from the Bible at several points.
Shaun Tabatt, in The NDE Conspiracy, engages Proof of Heaven directly and quotes Donald S. Whitney's evaluation. Whitney summarizes the "insurmountable difficulties" presented by Alexander's book: Jesus is absent from the experience and presumed nonessential; all people appear to be headed to heaven regardless of their beliefs or pursuit of God; and the portrait of God in the book, while lovely, does not square with the God revealed in the Bible at several key points.28 In short, the Jesus-shaped, cross-centered, repentance-requiring gospel of the New Testament is not the framework of Alexander's account.
Now apply our chapter's test to this situation. Something happened to Dr. Alexander. I am not claiming he made it up. He is a trained physician with a successful career, not a carnival barker. Something real happened during his coma, and it transformed him. But what happened needs to be distinguished from the message he draws from it.
When Alexander teaches that "love is all there is"—not love as the biblical character of the triune God, but love as an impersonal cosmic force that bathes everyone regardless of faith—he is drawing a theological conclusion that the Bible does not support.29 When he teaches that the cross is not necessary for salvation because everyone is already accepted, he is contradicting Galatians 2:21, which says that if righteousness could come without the cross, then "Christ died for no purpose." When he teaches that the particular, exclusive claims of Jesus—"I am the way, and the truth, and the life"—are relics of a narrower age that modern spiritual insight has transcended, he is contradicting the very words of Jesus Himself.
The Christian reader does not need to dismiss Dr. Alexander as a fraud to reject his teaching. We can accept that his experience was extraordinary. We can acknowledge that he is sincere. We can even appreciate the passages in his writing where something true comes through—the sense of being loved, the awareness of the reality of the unseen world, the hunger for meaning beyond materialism. But when the doctrinal claims diverge from the Bible, the doctrinal claims have to go. This is not about Dr. Alexander. This is about Scripture.
Many Christians have been caught in a particular kind of trap. A celebrity NDE book is marketed as "proof" of heaven. The author is credentialed—a doctor, a professor, an executive. The book is warm, inviting, full of love. Christians pick it up hoping for confirmation of what Scripture already teaches. What they often find is a mixture. Some of it does confirm Scripture. Some of it directly contradicts Scripture. The credentials and the warmth do not change the test. Content against Scripture is rejected, whatever letters follow the author's name.
I want to be clear about something. I am not saying Christians must refuse to read books like Proof of Heaven. Tabatt's "keep the meat, spit out the bones" rule applies perfectly here. If reading Alexander's book makes you more aware of the reality of the unseen world, of the possibility of consciousness beyond the brain, of the weight of eternity, good. Keep that meat. If his book also subtly teaches you that the Jesus of the Gospels was speaking from a limited perspective that has been corrected by a light-and-love vision from 2008, spit out that bone. The question is not whether you can read the book. The question is whether you can read it with a Bible open beside it, prepared to reject what the Bible forbids.
The same test applies, of course, to every NDE book, every NDE ministry, every NDE teacher. Some pass with flying colors. Some require significant filtering. Some should probably be set aside entirely. We will treat specific authors and teachers at length in Chapters 29 through 32, where we will try to give you a working theological orientation to the NDE publishing landscape. For now, the test is the same one we have been rehearsing. Any teacher whose teaching contradicts Scripture fails the Scripture test—regardless of how gentle, how credentialed, how popular, or how warm.
Whenever I have taught this material to Christians, two objections come back at me like clockwork. Let's take them one at a time, as honestly as we can. The first objection goes like this:
"You're privileging your interpretation of Scripture over someone else's direct, lived experience. Who are you to say what their experience meant? Isn't that arrogant? Isn't that a kind of spiritual bullying?"
I understand why this objection stings. No one wants to be the person standing in a hospital room telling a recovering cardiac patient that their beautiful encounter with the light was, in some respects, not what they think it was. That feels cold. It feels arrogant. It feels like we are elevating our theology over a real human being and their real tears.
But let me push back gently on three grounds.
First, we are not actually privileging our interpretation of Scripture over their experience. We are privileging Scripture itself, as best we can understand its clear teaching. There is a big difference between "this is my opinion about the Bible" and "the Bible plainly says X, and the NDE claim is not-X." When the Bible says Jesus is the only way to the Father, that is not an interpretive stretch. That is what the text says in plain language. When the Bible says a person dies once, that is not a creative reading. That is the sentence itself. So the objection would be fair if we were imposing a strained interpretation. It is not fair when we are simply repeating what Scripture says clearly.
Second, and more importantly: this is what Scripture itself commands. Go back to the Bereans in Acts 17:11. They listened to the Apostle Paul preach, and then they opened the Scriptures to see whether what he said matched up. They did not assume he was a liar. They did not dismiss him. They tested him. Luke, writing under inspiration, commended them for it. If the Apostle Paul was not above this test, then no NDEr, no NDE teacher, and no "being of light" is above it either.
Paul himself tells the Galatians, and the Corinthians, to test his teaching. He writes to the Thessalonians, "Test everything; hold fast what is good" (1 Thessalonians 5:21). He commands the Corinthian church to weigh prophetic utterances (1 Corinthians 14:29). In other words, the practice of testing all spiritual claims against Scripture is not arrogance. It is obedience. To refuse to test is the real error. It is to abdicate the responsibility Scripture has laid on every believer.30
Third, the charge of arrogance cuts the other way if we are not careful. Who is really being arrogant when an NDEr says, in effect, "My personal experience outweighs two thousand years of the church's teaching, the writings of the apostles, and the recorded words of Jesus Himself"? Setting up one's private vision as a higher authority than the public testimony of Christ and His apostles is the definition of placing self above Scripture. That is the arrogant position, no matter how warmly it is phrased.31 The humble position is to sit under Scripture, no matter what happened to us in the emergency room.
When you find yourself needing to gently correct a friend or family member whose NDE taught something unbiblical, lead with love, not a list of verses. Affirm that something happened to them. Affirm your love for them. Ask them to tell you the whole story. Then, only after genuine listening, raise the question: "Can we compare what the being taught you with what Jesus Himself taught in the Gospels? Because if there is a conflict, we have a problem." This is not cold corrective theology. This is the way a pastor loves his people: by refusing to let them trust a stranger's voice over the voice of the Good Shepherd.
The second objection is different. It goes something like this:
"If you say the Bible has the final word on everything about the spiritual realm, doesn't that make Christianity closed-minded? Doesn't it keep us from learning anything new? Haven't we learned a lot about the universe since the Bible was written? Shouldn't we be willing to update our theology based on new information?"
This is a fair question, and I want to answer it carefully. Because there is a real confusion lurking behind it, and if we untangle the confusion, the whole objection dissolves.
The confusion is this: the objector is running together two very different things. The first is new information about the physical world. The second is new revelation about God, salvation, the afterlife, and the spiritual realm. These are not the same. And Scripture makes a very different claim about each.
Scripture does not claim to be a scientific textbook. It does not tell us that the earth orbits the sun. It does not explain germ theory. It does not describe DNA. When we learn these things, we are not contradicting Scripture. We are discovering things Scripture never intended to teach in the first place. Christians rightly adjust their views about the physical world as science progresses, because the Bible was not trying to settle those questions.
But Scripture does claim to be the sufficient, final revelation from God on matters of doctrine—what God is like, how salvation works, what happens after death, what the spiritual realm contains, who Jesus is, how we are to live. These are exactly the areas where Scripture claims finality. These are exactly the areas where Galatians 1:8 applies: "even if an angel from heaven" brings a different message, "let him be accursed."32
Once you see the distinction, the objection evaporates. Christianity is not closed-minded about new information. Christianity is "closed" only in the sense that God has closed the canon—He has finished saying what needs to be said for our salvation and spiritual life. Christianity is very much open to observing the world, studying creation, and learning about reality. It is not open to a new gospel.
NDEs can and do add illustrative weight to biblical teaching. When an NDEr reports feeling overwhelmed by God's love, that is consistent with biblical teaching about God's love. When an NDEr reports a life review that produces deep repentance, that is consistent with biblical teaching about judgment. When an NDEr reports being reunited with loved ones who died in faith, that is consistent with biblical teaching about Paradise.33 All of this is welcome. None of it contradicts Scripture; it confirms and fills out what Scripture already teaches. John Burke is helpful on this point. He points out the wonderful convergence between mainstream Christian teaching and what NDErs commonly report—and he is very careful to say that we use NDEs to illustrate what Scripture teaches, not to add to or overturn it.34
What NDEs cannot do is add new doctrine to the Christian faith or cancel out what Scripture has already revealed. If an NDEr's account fills out what we already know from Scripture, welcome it gratefully. If it contradicts what Scripture teaches, reject that part of it firmly.
Christianity welcomes new information about the physical world (how stars burn, how germs spread, how the brain works during cardiac arrest). Christianity does not welcome new revelation about God, salvation, judgment, or the spiritual realm. Scripture has given us what is sufficient for faith and life. This distinction is not closed-mindedness. It is knowing the difference between what Scripture claims to teach and what Scripture leaves open.
I write this book from a Protestant evangelical perspective. The historic Protestant formula is sola Scriptura, which is Latin for "Scripture alone." It does not mean Protestants reject church history, creeds, or teachers. I love the early church fathers. I think the Nicene Creed is one of the most important documents in human history. But sola Scriptura means that when push comes to shove, Scripture alone is the final rule for doctrine and practice. Church tradition, personal experience, and even the best of human teachers all serve under Scripture.35
Readers who are Roman Catholic or Eastern Orthodox understand the authority question a little differently. Catholics and Orthodox hold Scripture together with authoritative Tradition (the teaching of the church over the centuries, the ecumenical councils, and in the Catholic case the magisterium) as jointly authoritative. They do not set Tradition above Scripture, but they do not isolate Scripture from Tradition the way classical Protestants do.
Here is the good news. For the specific question this chapter is asking—namely, can a private NDE override the public Christian faith?—Protestants, Catholics, and Orthodox all answer no. Whether you understand the rule as "Scripture alone" or "Scripture and Tradition together," no private revelation can overturn the public deposit of faith. The Catholic Catechism is explicit that private revelations (even approved ones) never "complete" or correct public revelation; they at best serve to help the faithful live the faith already handed down.36
So whether you are reading this as a Reformed Presbyterian, a Southern Baptist, a Lutheran, a Methodist, a Roman Catholic, or an Eastern Orthodox Christian, the principle of this chapter applies. The historic Christian faith cannot be overridden by any individual NDE. Different traditions will put the framing slightly differently, but the outcome is the same.
I should also speak briefly to a second divide among Christians. Some Christians are what we call cessationists. They believe the miraculous gifts of the Spirit—prophecy, words of knowledge, miraculous healing, speaking in tongues—ceased at the end of the apostolic age. On this view, God's direct, revelatory communication to His people runs through Scripture alone. Other Christians are continuationists or charismatics. They believe the Spirit continues to give these gifts today, though in a way that is subordinate to Scripture.
For the purposes of NDE discernment, Christians on both sides of this debate can happily agree on this chapter's principle. And that's important to see.
If you are a cessationist, you will be especially alert to NDE claims of new revelation from "beings of light." You will say, "God does not normally speak that way anymore. So whatever this is, it is almost certainly not new divine revelation." You may be more suspicious of NDEs generally than a charismatic brother would be. Fine. But even you do not deny that angels exist or that God sometimes works through unusual means. You simply hold the bar high. And Scripture remains your rule. No problem.37
If you are a continuationist, you believe God still speaks through prophetic utterances today. You are more open to the possibility that some NDE and DBE accounts really do represent God's active communication. Good. But continuationism, rightly understood, has always held that prophetic utterances today are subordinate to Scripture and must be tested against Scripture. Paul says to the Corinthians, "Let two or three prophets speak, and let the others weigh what is said" (1 Corinthians 14:29). He says to the Thessalonians, "Do not despise prophecies, but test everything; hold fast what is good" (1 Thessalonians 5:20–21). Even for charismatic Christians, any NDE claim that contradicts Scripture is to be rejected.
So the continuationist may say "this NDE could be a genuine work of God," while the cessationist says "this NDE is certainly something else," and they may disagree about whether the phenomenon is usually supernatural or usually natural. But both agree on the bottom line: Scripture tests every claim. A continuationist who accepts an NDE message that contradicts the Bible is not being a better charismatic than Paul; he is simply not following Paul's rules for testing prophecy. And a cessationist who dismisses every NDE without careful pastoral inquiry is not being faithful to Scripture either; he is being careless about a real phenomenon many Christians have encountered.
The Scripture-above-experience principle is common ground for all orthodox Christians. This is one of those places where, in the NDE conversation, we need to lower our weapons and recognize that on the decisive question, we stand together.
Let's say one more thing about what Scripture claims for itself. Because there is a related doctrine to the authority of Scripture that deserves a paragraph or two. It's the doctrine of the sufficiency of Scripture.
The authority of Scripture says that the Bible has the right to tell us what to believe and how to live. The sufficiency of Scripture says the Bible tells us everything we need to know for salvation and godly life. Paul, writing to Timothy just after declaring that all Scripture is God-breathed, says Scripture is able to "make you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus" and "that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work" (2 Timothy 3:15–17). Complete. Equipped for every good work. Not partially equipped, waiting for a dream or an NDE to fill in the missing pieces. Complete.38
This is profoundly comforting. It means the Christian who has never had a vision, never been caught up to the third heaven, never heard a voice in the night, and never had an NDE is not missing anything essential. Your Bible is enough. The ordinary Christian with an open Bible, an open heart, and a willing spirit has access to everything she needs for salvation and a life of faithful discipleship. You do not need an NDE to know God. You do not need a dream. You do not need a word of prophecy. You have the written Word, and it is enough.
Why does this matter for NDE discernment? Because it settles a creeping anxiety that sometimes haunts believers in our moment. It goes like this: "Everyone else seems to be having these amazing spiritual experiences. If I don't have one, am I missing something? Am I a second-class Christian? Should I be trying to cultivate one?" The doctrine of sufficiency answers: no. You are not missing anything. You are not second-class. Scripture is enough. The person who has walked with Jesus for fifty years, reading His Word and loving His people, has not missed a thing by not having a cardiac arrest. Sometimes I think we forget this, and we let the NDE literature make us secretly envious, as if the testifier has had a privileged education we missed. Scripture teaches the opposite. The open Bible is the real privilege. Every other Christian experience, from the most dramatic to the most ordinary, is a supplement at best.
Before we land this plane, I want to head off two misunderstandings that sometimes attach themselves to the Scripture-above-experience principle. Because over the years I have watched good Christians take a true principle and push it in unhelpful directions.
Some Christian teachers have taken the principle of scriptural authority and drawn from it the conclusion that every NDE must therefore be either a hallucination or a demonic deception. This does not follow, and the evidence does not support it. As we saw in Chapter 5, the majority of NDEs lack clearly unbiblical elements and are often consistent with biblical teaching about the intermediate state.39 J. Steve Miller's systematic review of consecutively submitted NDEs on the NDERF site found that explicit contradiction of biblical doctrine is actually the exception, not the rule.40
The Scripture-above-experience principle does not mean "all experience is suspect." It means "all experience is tested." Those are different claims. Gold is tested in the fire because gold is valuable, not because everything that looks like gold is fake. Most NDEs pass the test. When they fail it in certain elements, we reject those elements. When they pass, we receive them with gratitude. But we always, always test.
A second misunderstanding cuts the other direction. Some Christians, uncomfortable with how dramatically spiritual experience has shaped their neighbors' lives, conclude that experience is irrelevant. "Only what Scripture teaches matters. Experience is a distraction." This is also wrong.
Experience is not irrelevant. God made us to experience Him. The Bible is full of dramatic spiritual experiences—Abraham meeting the LORD, Moses at the burning bush, Isaiah seeing the throne, Paul on the Damascus road, Peter at the Transfiguration, John on Patmos. These are all first-order spiritual experiences. The Bible takes them seriously. We should too.
What we must not do is elevate experience above Scripture. Experience is a servant, not a master. Experience, when it passes the test of Scripture, can deepen and illustrate and enliven what Scripture teaches. Experience, when it contradicts Scripture, is unmasked as false or misinterpreted. But experience, whether affirming or contradicting Scripture, is always tested—never the tester.
Gerald Walls once captured this balance beautifully: Christians should be neither "experience-denying" nor "experience-worshiping," but "experience-testing." That phrase, I think, should be framed above every Christian engagement with the NDE literature.41
All right. Enough theology. Let's get practical. You are probably not reading this book in a library cubicle just to sharpen your technical vocabulary. You are reading it because someone in your life has had an NDE, or because you are reading NDE books and feeling unsettled, or because you are a pastor who keeps bumping into these questions. How does the Scripture-above-experience principle actually work in everyday life?
Let me suggest five practices.
First: Slow down. When someone tells you an NDE story, resist the urge to render a verdict in the first five seconds. Dramatic stories provoke dramatic reactions. But dramatic reactions are usually the wrong ones. Take time. Ask questions. Listen. Let the whole story come out. Separate in your mind what the person experienced from what they think the experience means. We will develop this distinction fully in Chapter 9, but you can already begin practicing it now.
Second: Write the message down. If there is a specific theological claim in the account—something a being told the experiencer, or something the experiencer now believes the experience taught—write it out as clearly as you can. This forces the claim into daylight. Many bad teachings in the NDE literature thrive in the glow of emotional story; they shrivel when reduced to a plain sentence. "The being of light told me there is no hell." Now that we have the sentence in front of us, we can test it against Scripture.
Third: Compare that claim to Scripture. Not to your tradition. Not to your pastor's last sermon. Not to your gut feeling. To Scripture. Look up the verses that speak to that claim. Read them slowly. Take note of whether the biblical text clearly contradicts the NDE claim or whether the NDE claim might be a faithful extension of biblical teaching.42
Fourth: Keep the meat, spit out the bones. This phrase comes from Shaun Tabatt, and I love it. Most NDE accounts are not all gold or all dross. They are mixtures. The claim is genuine; the interpretation is confused. Or the experience is rich and Christ-exalting; the subsequent teaching built upon it has drifted into syncretism. The mature Christian reads with discernment. Receive what passes the test. Reject what fails it. Don't throw the whole thing away because one element is off. Don't swallow the whole thing because one element rang true.43
Fifth: Lead with love. This is for when you are talking to an actual human being—your dying grandmother, your skeptical brother-in-law, your friend who just read Proof of Heaven and is in tears. The principle of Scripture-above-experience does not give you permission to be cold. It does not license a grim, arms-crossed, theological inquisition over the hospital bed. Love and truth travel together. Your job is to hold the biblical line without being a jerk about it. Usually that means listening twice as much as you speak, asking gentle questions rather than delivering pronouncements, and making sure the person knows you love them before they learn what you think about their experience.
When you must gently correct a loved one whose NDE taught them something unbiblical, remember: you are not trying to win an argument. You are trying to protect their soul and the souls of those they will tell. Speak the truth in love. Do not raise your voice. Do not quote Galatians 1:8 at them like a sword. Sit with them. Ask them to read the Gospels with you. Trust the Spirit to do through Scripture what no sermon of yours can do on its own. Your job is faithful presence with an open Bible—not victory.
Before we close, I want to say something I think gets left out of books like this one too often. We have spent this whole chapter saying that Scripture tests experience. Everything I have said stands. But I want to add one more layer, because without it, this chapter could be taken as a kind of Christian arrogance.
Here it is: our reading of Scripture is not infallible. Scripture itself is infallible. But my particular interpretation of what Scripture teaches on a given question could be mistaken. Faithful Christians across the centuries have disagreed about many things while sharing a high view of biblical authority. The Bible is the standard. My confidence in my specific reading of the Bible on any given contested question is a different matter.
This is why the principle of this chapter applies most sharply to clear teachings of Scripture. "There is no hell" contradicts clear Scripture. "Jesus is one path among many" contradicts clear Scripture. "Humans will become gods" contradicts clear Scripture. These are not disputed points among orthodox Christians who have read their Bibles carefully. On these questions, the lines are bright.
Other questions are genuinely harder. Exactly what is the nature of the intermediate state? How exactly does the final judgment unfold? What will resurrected bodies be like? Orthodox Christians working from the same Bible have reached somewhat different conclusions on these questions. On such matters, humility is in order. An NDE claim that bumps against one school's reading of a disputed text is not automatically false. We need to let Scripture speak clearly before we call the claim false, and that sometimes takes more work than a bumper-sticker answer allows.
The posture, then, is not smug certainty. It is grounded humility. Confident that Scripture is the standard. Humble about our ability to apply it perfectly in every case. Willing to do the hard work of listening to the text and to our brothers and sisters as we seek to be faithful.44
One more thing needs saying here. The Christian who holds this principle is not thereby immune to being wrong. You will, at times, mistakenly reject as unbiblical something that, with fuller understanding, you might later see as faithful after all. You will, at other times, mistakenly accept as biblical something that closer study shows to be off. None of us reads the Bible perfectly. What Scripture-above-experience offers us is not inerrancy of our own interpretations. It is a fixed standard to which we can return, again and again, to correct our mistakes, refine our readings, and test our conclusions. Its fixity is the very thing that makes progress possible. If Scripture itself were fluid—if every new NDE could add a chapter to it—we would have no way to get anything right. Because Scripture stands, we have a place to stand too. And because God Himself has set us in that place, He will not leave us there without His Spirit to help us hear what He has said.
We began with two pastors at Bill's hospital bed. The first pastor caved. The second pastor stood his ground, kindly. The second pastor was right. This chapter has tried to explain why.
Scripture is God-breathed (2 Timothy 3:16). Scripture is more reliable than even eyewitness experience on the Mount of Transfiguration (2 Peter 1:16–21). Scripture cannot be added to or subtracted from (Deuteronomy 4:2; Revelation 22:18–19). Scripture stands against any different gospel, even if delivered by an angel (Galatians 1:6–9). Scripture is the Berean test for every teacher, including apostles (Acts 17:11). Scripture is sufficient to make the Christian complete, equipped for every good work (2 Timothy 3:17).
All of this means that the Christian who sits with an NDE account and a Bible has the tools she needs. She does not need to be a professional theologian. She does not need to memorize lists of authors to trust and authors to avoid, though those lists can help. She does not need to run every experience past her pastor, though her pastor can help too. She needs the book God breathed out, and she needs the willingness to let that book be the rule. That is what Christian discernment has looked like for two thousand years, and it still works.
The Christian with an open Bible and a willing heart is equipped for discernment in any era, including ours. The NDE literature, however large and glossy, does not change the equation. God's breath is still on these pages. His Son still speaks through them. His Spirit still illumines them. And when a dramatic experience and the plain teaching of Scripture come into conflict, Scripture wins. Always. No exceptions. Not because we are afraid of experience. Not because we want to keep Christianity small. But because the God who spoke the world into being has spoken to us in His Word, and what He has said does not come apart in the face of a bright light, a warm feeling, or a confident teacher. His Word stands.
In the next chapter, we will develop a companion principle that this one needs—the distinction between an experience itself and the interpretation placed on the experience. That distinction will unlock a great deal of the puzzle we face in the NDE literature. But it only works because we already have in place what we just built: that Scripture, not experience, does the final testing. With that foundation laid, we can turn to the more delicate work of sorting experiences from interpretations, real encounters from confused framings, and gold from dross.
· · ·
Alexander, Eben. Proof of Heaven: A Neurosurgeon's Journey into the Afterlife. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2012.
Alexander, Eben, and Ptolemy Tompkins. The Map of Heaven: How Science, Religion, and Ordinary People Are Proving the Afterlife. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2014.
Beale, G. K. The Book of Revelation. New International Greek Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1999.
Bruce, F. F. The Book of the Acts. Revised edition. New International Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1988.
Burke, John. Imagine Heaven: Near-Death Experiences, God's Promises, and the Exhilarating Future That Awaits You. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 2015.
Carson, D. A. The Gospel According to John. Pillar New Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1991.
Catechism of the Catholic Church. 2nd ed. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 1997.
Cooper, John W. Body, Soul, and Life Everlasting: Biblical Anthropology and the Monism-Dualism Debate. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2000.
DeYoung, Kevin. Taking God at His Word: Why the Bible Is Knowable, Necessary, and Enough, and What That Means for You and Me. Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2014.
Farris, Joshua R. An Introduction to Theological Anthropology: Humans, Both Creaturely and Divine. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2020.
Fee, Gordon D. The First Epistle to the Corinthians. Revised edition. New International Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2014.
Fee, Gordon D., and Douglas Stuart. How to Read the Bible for All Its Worth. 4th ed. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2014.
France, R. T. The Gospel of Matthew. New International Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2007.
Frame, John M. The Doctrine of the Word of God. Phillipsburg, NJ: P&R Publishing, 2010.
Fudge, Edward W. The Fire That Consumes: A Biblical and Historical Study of the Doctrine of Final Punishment. 3rd ed. Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2011.
Gaffin, Richard B., Jr. Perspectives on Pentecost: New Testament Teaching on the Gifts of the Holy Spirit. Phillipsburg, NJ: P&R Publishing, 1979.
Grudem, Wayne. Systematic Theology: An Introduction to Biblical Doctrine. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2020.
Long, Jeffrey. God and the Afterlife: The Groundbreaking New Evidence for God and Near-Death Experience. New York: HarperOne, 2016.
Mathison, Keith A. The Shape of Sola Scriptura. Moscow, ID: Canon Press, 2001.
Miller, J. Steve. Is Christianity Compatible with Deathbed and Near-Death Experiences? The Surprising Presence of Jesus, Scarcity of Anti-Christian Elements, and Compatibility with Historic Christian Teachings. Acworth, GA: Wisdom Creek Press, 2023.
Moo, Douglas J. 2 Peter and Jude. NIV Application Commentary. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1996.
O'Brien, Peter T. The Letter to the Hebrews. Pillar New Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2010.
Peterson, Robert A. Hell on Trial: The Case for Eternal Punishment. Phillipsburg, NJ: P&R Publishing, 1995.
Plantinga, Cornelius, Jr. Not the Way It's Supposed to Be: A Breviary of Sin. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1995.
Sabom, Michael. Light and Death: One Doctor's Fascinating Account of Near-Death Experiences. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1998.
Schreiner, Thomas R. 1, 2 Peter, Jude. New American Commentary. Nashville: Broadman & Holman, 2003.
Silva, Moisés, ed. New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology and Exegesis. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2014.
Sprinkle, Preston, ed. Four Views on Hell. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2016.
Stott, John. The Cross of Christ. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1986.
Tabatt, Shaun. The NDE Conspiracy. Shippensburg, PA: Destiny Image, 2025.
Thompson, Mark D. A Clear and Present Word: The Clarity of Scripture. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2006.
Walls, Jerry L. Heaven: The Logic of Eternal Joy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
Walton, John H. Ancient Near Eastern Thought and the Old Testament: Introducing the Conceptual World of the Hebrew Bible. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2018.
Ward, Timothy. Words of Life: Scripture as the Living and Active Word of God. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2009.
Warfield, B. B. The Inspiration and Authority of the Bible. Edited by Samuel G. Craig. Phillipsburg, NJ: Presbyterian & Reformed, 1948.
Weeks, Noel. The Sufficiency of Scripture. Carlisle, PA: Banner of Truth, 1988.
Wenham, John. Christ and the Bible. 3rd ed. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2009.
Wilkinson, Michael A. Crowned with Glory and Honor: A Chalcedonian Anthropology. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2022.